apismith.blogg.se

Cast of youth consequences
Cast of youth consequences





cast of youth consequences
  1. Cast of youth consequences manual#
  2. Cast of youth consequences registration#
  3. Cast of youth consequences verification#

Malware-malicious software that includes worms, spyware, viruses, Trojan horses, and ransomware-is perhaps the greatest threat to electronic voting. A DoS attack targeting select jurisdictions could alter the outcome of an election. When employed against even a limited number of jurisdictions, DoS disruptions could lead to a loss in confidence in overall election integrity. 2 DoS can be used to disrupt vote casting, vote tallying, or election audits by preventing access to e-pollbooks, electronic voting systems, or electronic auditing systems. Denial-of-service Attacksĭenial-of-service (DoS) attacks interrupt or slow access to computer systems. Security vulnerabilities can be exploited to electronically disrupt voting or affect vote counts at polling locations or in instances of remote voting. This evidence could include original artifacts (e.g., cast ballots) or supplemental data provided to enable external auditing and verification.

Cast of youth consequences verification#

Tallies may be inaccurately reported because of carelessness or malicious activity.Īfter the primary reporting of results, evidence that enables verification of the reported results may be altered or destroyed.

Cast of youth consequences manual#

Counting errors may affect manual or electronic tallying methods. Voting equipment failures or inadequate supplies could prevent vote collection.Īfter votes have been cast, physical or electronic ballots can be altered, destroyed, or lost.

Cast of youth consequences registration#

Registration data may be altered to disenfranchise voters. Disruptions in mail or Internet service may adversely affect remote voters. Information on voting locations, voting times, and voting processes may be manipulated to mislead potential voters. Voters can be physically barred or otherwise deterred (e.g., by intimidation) from access-ġ Other threats, e.g., disinformation campaigns, gerrymandering, etc., may affect election integrity and, while important, were viewed by the committee as outside of its charge. There are many ways to prevent the casting of votes.

  • altering or destroying evidence necessary to audit and verify the correct reporting of election results.
  • introducing inaccuracies in the recording, maintenance, and tallying of votes and/or.
  • Malicious actors can affect vote counts by: Election tallies and reporting may also be affected by malicious actors. Vote counts can be affected if fraudulent voting, e.g., multiple voting, illegal voting, etc., occurs. Inaccuracies may be introduced by human error or because of a lack of proper oversight. Election results may be improperly tallied or reported. There are numerous ways in which the integrity of elections can be affected. The committee then assesses the widely proposed suggestion that ballots be cast via the Internet. Two topics that play critical roles in protecting this integrity, cybersecurity and auditing, are considered. In this chapter, the committee discusses threats to the integrity of U.S.







    Cast of youth consequences